Representing a client facing multiple counts of conspiracy to import and supply class A drugs jointly with multiple defendants. The case involved a 10-week trial at the Crown Court, thousands of pages of evidence and a client whose livelihood was at stake. The drugs were said to be imported from Holland and then distributed throughout the UK using different means. The case involved cell-site analysis evidence, mobile phone evidence ANPR evidence and expert evidence. The case was successfully defended for the client following not guilty verdicts on all 6 counts. The client could have faced 15-20 years in prison.

Representing a client facing 3 counts of money laundering jointly with multiple defendants. Case involved the use of solicitors, estate agents and surveyors to move millions of pounds of money that was being obtained illegally. The evidence was scrutinised and severely tested during a lengthy 8-week trial at the Crown Court. The Jury returned a not guilty verdict for the client. The client could have faced 14 in prison.

The client faced a 12-week trial together with 16 other defendants before the Crown Court for the alleged trafficking of persons from eastern Europe to then be used in organised crime in the UK. There were mountains of evidence that has to be scrutinised and challenged and in all, over 100,000 pages. The evidence related to all kinds such as CCTV, cell-site analysis, mobile raw data, ANPR, witness statements, forensics, documents, bank statements, overseas evidence and more. All evidence had to be challenged in order to seek a result for the client. During the trial, the evidence was successfully challenged to achieve not guilty verdicts on all counts. The client would have faced in excess of 18 years in prison if he was found guilty.